Author summary
⁠25%6 analyzed articles/videos11,875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giulia Carbonaro results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 2,126 hits. Analysis detected 22,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,500 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (8,972 of 9,471 authors). This Giulia Carbonaro is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Giulia Carbonaro
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠6%Giulia Carbonaro (selected)1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 47,500
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
1.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles47.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos