Author summary
49% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gillian McGoldrick results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 1,556 hits . Analysis detected 10,854 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,652 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (7,644 of 8,803 authors). This Gillian McGoldrick is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Gillian McGoldrick
Author details
Total words: 19,652
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles19.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst