Author summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgina Torbet results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 1,048 hits . Analysis detected 7,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (936 of 8,692 authors). This Georgina Torbet is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Georgina Torbet
Author details
Total words: 3,916
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.2% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.1% 17.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 12.1% 12.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.5% 17.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.8% 26.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 19.6% 19.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Author 12.1%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst