Author summary
64%3 analyzed articles/videos2,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George P. Brooks results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 907 hits. Analysis detected 7,762 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,900 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,393 of 9,471 authors). This George P. Brooks is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
George P. Brooks
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
44%George P. Brooks (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,900
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos