Author summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garrett Leahy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 642 hits . Analysis detected 3,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (6,099 of 8,623 authors). This Garrett Leahy is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Garrett Leahy
Author details
Total words: 6,420
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst