Author summary
31% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Garrett Grochowski results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 466 hits . Analysis detected 2,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,124 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,388 of 8,944 authors). This Garrett Grochowski is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Garrett Grochowski
Author details
Total words: 5,124
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst