Author summary
31%2 analyzed articles/videos1,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabrielle Calise results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 2,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,506 of 8,593 authors). This Gabrielle Calise is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Gabrielle Calise
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
36%Gabrielle Calise (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,048
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos