Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These From Ohio State Highway Patrol results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 337 hits . Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,960 of 9,311 authors). This From Ohio State Highway Patrol is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. From Ohio State Highway Patrol
Author details
Total words: 1,636
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 20.6% 20.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Indoctrination: Author 20.6%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst