Author summary
43% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Kummer results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,635 of 9,486 authors). This Frank Kummer is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Frank Kummer
Author details
Total words: 5,668
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst