Author summary
77% 1 analyzed article/video 960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frances Daniels results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 615 hits . Analysis detected 2,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,246 of 9,277 authors). This Frances Daniels is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Frances Daniels
Author details
Total words: 2,880
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 21.4% 21.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 21.4%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst