Author summary
28% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fechi Inyama results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 486 hits . Analysis detected 3,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,681 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,540 of 9,075 authors). This Fechi Inyama is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Fechi Inyama
Author details
Total words: 6,681
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst