Science News⁠24%

These tiny swirls on the sun could trigger solar flares ⁠20%

By Fechi Inyama⁠28%

8/5/2026, 8:00:00 AM

Topics: Space, Astronomy
Keywords: Swirl, Solar Flares

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 601 faulty-reasoning hits from 433 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (23,499 of 29,309 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the article peer group.

High-energy whirlpools speckle the sun’s surface. 
New telescope images show a huge telescope observed the swirls for the first time on the sun its surface. 
The observations, reported August 5 in <em>Nature</em>, are the most detailed taken of the sun to date. 
The images also provide evidence for a type of fluid instability that might explain the sun’s outbursts, such as solar flares and eruptions. 
“This instability occurs everywhere at the boundaries of solar magnetic elements,” says astrophysicist David Kuridze of the National Solar Observatory headquartered in Boulder, Colo. 
Solar magnetic elements are regions of highly magnetized plasma on the sun’s surface. 
There are millions of them, and energy from their magnetized plasma can be transferred, stabilized and transformed by swirling motions — a phenomenon called the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. 
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, or KHI, occurs when two fluid layers move next to each other at different speeds. 
A small disruption in the balance of these two forces can cause curling motions that roll up into waves. 
The instability has been observed in some ocean waves, clouds, Jupiter’s atmosphere and even the sun’s atmosphere. 
But it has never been directly observed on the sun’s&nbsp;surface — until now.&nbsp; 
The Daniel K. 
Inouye Solar Telescope captured the new images. 
The telescope,&nbsp;located&nbsp;near the summit of the Haleakalā volcano in Maui, Hawaii, is the largest&nbsp;solar observatory in the world&nbsp;and&nbsp;sports a mirror measuring 4 meters in diameter.&nbsp;It can take images of the sun’s surface at a higher resolution than was previously possible.&nbsp;&nbsp; 
The new images show that on the&nbsp;sun’s magnetized surface,&nbsp;the&nbsp;Kelvin-Helmholtz&nbsp;instability&nbsp;can convert swirling plasma, which acts as a fluid, into tension that twists the magnetic field. 
That creates energy that can cause a solar explosion.&nbsp; 
“Detecting these KHI structures requires resolving [structures] down to the 20-kilometer scale, a level of detail that was simply invisible until now,” Kuridze says. 
To get such a crisp view, engineers also incorporated an adaptive system that corrects blurring caused by Earth’s turbulent atmosphere. 
This was crucial for fixing distortions that would have otherwise destroyed such fine resolution images, says Leon Ofman, an astrophysicist at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., who was not involved in the study. 
Understanding how magnetic structures on the sun’s surface transfer energy in fluidlike motion could provide insights into how solar activity develops. 
“We are now beginning to understand that we need to study this process in order to understand all the stages of the transfer of energy from the interior [of the&nbsp;sun], going to the surface &#8230; and then affecting us on Earth and beyond,” Ofman&nbsp;says.&nbsp; 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.9%Fechi Inyama: 3.4%Science News: 2.5%Confirmation Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 1.0%Science News: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Fechi Inyama: 2.6%Science News: 2.0%Availability Heuristic3.9%This article: 6.2%Fechi Inyama: 0.8%Science News: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic6.2%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.6%Science News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Fechi Inyama: 1.5%Science News: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 4.7%Science News: 3.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.2%Fechi Inyama: 0.8%Science News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Fechi Inyama: 2.2%Science News: 3.3%Optimism Bias12.2%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 3.2%Science News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 3.1%Science News: 3.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.4%Science News: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Fechi Inyama: 1.6%Science News: 0.9%Halo Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Fechi Inyama: 1.2%Science News: 0.8%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.7%Science News: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.9%Fechi Inyama: 7.3%Science News: 3.5%Appeal to Authority24.9%This article: 2.1%Fechi Inyama: 0.5%Science News: 1.0%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.9%Science News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.9%Fechi Inyama: 3.5%Science News: 3.5%Hasty Generalization3.9%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.2%Science News: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 1.5%Science News: 1.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.9%Fechi Inyama: 3.5%Science News: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.9%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.4%Science News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.4%Science News: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.4%Science News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.5%Science News: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.6%Fechi Inyama: 2.6%Science News: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.6%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.9%Fechi Inyama: 2.9%Science News: 0.6%Unattributed Quote13.9%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.8%Science News: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 6.7%Fechi Inyama: 5.4%Science News: 2.0%Biased Writer Voice6.7%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.4%Science News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fechi Inyama: 0.0%Science News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S
0.0%

433 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers30%attributed speech305writer words
Selected voice

David Kuridze

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words38% of attributed speech74% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote+50.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%David Kuridze: 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.5 ptsWriter: 9.5%David Kuridze: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading

Loading

Loading

Loading


Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.