Author summary
87% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farida Jhabvala Romero results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 2,922 hits . Analysis detected 20,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,500 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,521 of 9,216 authors). This Farida Jhabvala Romero is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Farida Jhabvala Romero
Author details
Total words: 19,500
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst