Author summary
43%1 analyzed article/video4,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evelina Johansson Wilén results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 2,211 hits. Analysis detected 10,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,521 of 8,818 authors). This Evelina Johansson Wilén is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Evelina Johansson Wilén
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
27%Evelina Johansson Wilén (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,060
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos