Author summary
44%4 analyzed articles/videos1,834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erik Neumann results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 541 hits. Analysis detected 5,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,534 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 34% (5,791 of 8,766 authors). This Erik Neumann is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Erik Neumann
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
34%Erik Neumann (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,534
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate