Author summary
45% 2 analyzed articles/videos 539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erich Richter results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 209 hits . Analysis detected 1,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,924 of 8,965 authors). This Erich Richter is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Erich Richter
Author details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst