Author summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric S. Edelman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,272 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,982 of 9,074 authors). This Eric S. Edelman is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Eric S. Edelman
Author details
Total words: 2,272
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst