Author summary
27%2 analyzed articles/videos1,720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric E. Garcia results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 859 hits. Analysis detected 3,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,880 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 49% (4,802 of 9,351 authors). This Eric E. Garcia is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Eric E. Garcia
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
49%Eric E. Garcia (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,880
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 12.5%12.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos