Author summary
76% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Frederickson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 1,326 hits . Analysis detected 8,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,246 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 30% (6,688 of 9,487 authors). This Emma Frederickson is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Emma Frederickson
Author details
Total words: 13,246
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst