Author summary
21% 1 analyzed article/video 318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Worrell results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 702 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,243 of 9,482 authors). This Emily Worrell is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Emily Worrell
Author details
Total words: 1,272
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst