Author summary
29% 1 analyzed article/video 1,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Wilson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 1,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,385 of 9,471 authors). This Emily Wilson is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Emily Wilson
Author details
Total words: 4,800
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst