Author summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 1,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Scolnick results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 632 hits . Analysis detected 2,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 34% (5,664 of 8,528 authors). This Emily Scolnick is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Emily Scolnick
Author details
Total words: 4,596
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst