Author summary
38% 1 analyzed article/video 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Dreyfuss results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 299 hits . Analysis detected 1,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,024 of 8,802 authors). This Emily Dreyfuss is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Emily Dreyfuss
Author details
Total words: 3,560
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst