Author summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellen Beshuk results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 518 hits . Analysis detected 3,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,212 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (2,503 of 9,471 authors). This Ellen Beshuk is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group. Ellen Beshuk
Author details
Total words: 3,212
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst