Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ella Whelan results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 919 hits . Analysis detected 4,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,977 of 9,487 authors). This Ella Whelan is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Ella Whelan
Author details
Total words: 4,176
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.0% 22.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.4% 14.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst