Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ella Adams results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 626 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,307 authors). This Ella Adams is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ella Adams
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Ella Adams (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 626
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles626 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos