Author summary
1%2 analyzed articles/videos570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Izzo results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 150 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,042 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 8% (8,695 of 9,396 authors). This Elizabeth Izzo is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Izzo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
8%Elizabeth Izzo (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,042
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 2.1%2.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos