Author summary
19% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Howell results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,181 hits . Analysis detected 7,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,896 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (8,302 of 9,263 authors). This Elizabeth Howell is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Elizabeth Howell
Author details
Total words: 16,896
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst