Author summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eladio Bobadilla results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Representativeness Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 3,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (3,735 of 8,782 authors). This Eladio Bobadilla is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Eladio Bobadilla
Author details
Total words: 3,712
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst