Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eilís O'Neill results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,697 hits . Analysis detected 11,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,669 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,385 of 9,471 authors). This Eilís O'Neill is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Eilís O'Neill
Author details
Total words: 7,669
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.3% 12.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.1% 22.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst