Author summary
72% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dylan Scott results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,457 hits . Analysis detected 13,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,124 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,826 of 9,471 authors). This Dylan Scott is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Dylan Scott
Author details
Total words: 17,124
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles17.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst