Author summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dylan Goforth results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,092 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (8,250 of 9,471 authors). This Dylan Goforth is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Dylan Goforth
Author details
Total words: 6,092
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst