Author summary
35%1 analyzed article/video2,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dustin Tingley results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 788 hits. Analysis detected 2,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,134 of 8,942 authors). This Dustin Tingley is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Dustin Tingley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
43%Dustin Tingley (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,148
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos