Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Douglas P. Marsh results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 558 hits . Analysis detected 5,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,469 of 9,471 authors). This Douglas P. Marsh is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Douglas P. Marsh
Author details
Total words: 5,748
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst