Author summary
12%3 analyzed articles/videos5,891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dora Scott results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 1,653 hits. Analysis detected 13,742 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,452 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (9,005 of 9,213 authors). This Dora Scott is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Dora Scott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
3%Dora Scott (selected)1%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 40,452
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.3% percentile
0.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles40.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate