Author summary
32% 1 analyzed article/video 2,069 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominik A. Leusder results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 888 hits . Analysis detected 4,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 22% (7,434 of 9,471 authors). This Dominik A. Leusder is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Dominik A. Leusder
Author details
Total words: 8,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.7% 10.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst