Author summary
29% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dionne Phillips results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 830 hits . Analysis detected 6,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,184 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,880 of 9,383 authors). This Dionne Phillips is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Dionne Phillips
Author details
Total words: 13,184
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst