Author summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Destiny Herbers results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 1,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,118 of 9,470 authors). This Destiny Herbers is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Destiny Herbers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠89%Destiny Herbers (selected)6%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,228
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 8.1%8.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.9%1.9%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Middle Ground: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos