Author summary
30% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denise Oliver Velez results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,438 hits . Analysis detected 7,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,560 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (7,019 of 8,706 authors). This Denise Oliver Velez is better (less manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group. Denise Oliver Velez
Author details
Total words: 15,560
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst