Author summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David L. Pokress results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.9% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 325 faulty-reasoning hits from 204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (33 of 8,741 authors). This David L. Pokress is worse (more manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
David L. Pokress
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%David L. Pokress (selected)27%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 204
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

100% percentile
025507510099.6% percentile
26.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles204 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 56.9%56.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 28.4%28.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 22.6%22.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 28.9%28.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Author 56.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 28.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 28.4%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 22.6%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos