Author summary
58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Fischer results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,210 hits . Analysis detected 5,974 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,633 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,548 of 9,468 authors). This David Fischer is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group. David Fischer
Author details
Total words: 9,633
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst