Author summary
69%3 analyzed articles/videos734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Edwards results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 596 hits. Analysis detected 3,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,929 of 8,525 authors). This David Edwards is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
David Edwards
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
66%David Edwards (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.2%16.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate