Author summary
91% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Goldiner results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 2,026 hits . Analysis detected 10,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,024 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,174 of 9,471 authors). This Dave Goldiner is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Dave Goldiner
Author details
Total words: 8,024
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.3% 25.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.0% 20.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.6% 14.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst