Author summary
23%1 analyzed article/video1,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darius Tahir results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 516 hits. Analysis detected 2,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 26% (7,091 of 9,471 authors). This Darius Tahir is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Darius Tahir
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
26%Darius Tahir (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,988
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Special Pleading: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos