Author summary
88% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Venton results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 700 hits . Analysis detected 5,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,613 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,290 of 9,471 authors). This Danielle Venton is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Danielle Venton
Author details
Total words: 4,613
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.8% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.7% 8.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 9.7% 9.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Nature: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst