Author summary
57%1 analyzed article/video420 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Flatley results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,390 of 9,487 authors). This Daniel Flatley is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Daniel Flatley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
86%Daniel Flatley (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,680
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510085.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.8%15.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.7%10.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Tu Quoque: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos