Author summary
16%1 analyzed article/video1,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Dassow results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Recency Bias, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,376 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (8,018 of 9,471 authors). This Daniel Dassow is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Daniel Dassow
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
16%Daniel Dassow (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,312
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.3% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos