Author summary
58% 3 analyzed articles/videos 475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Cody results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 370 hits . Analysis detected 2,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,912 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,754 of 9,443 authors). This Daniel Cody is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Daniel Cody
Author details
Total words: 2,912
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst