Author summary
9% 1 analyzed article/video 543 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dana Richie results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Recency Bias , with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 72 hits . Analysis detected 729 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,771 of 9,487 authors). This Dana Richie is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Dana Richie
Author details
Total words: 2,172
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Horn Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst