Author summary
29%3 analyzed articles/videos1,187 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Colorado Public Radio results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 3,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,558 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (5,449 of 8,725 authors). This Colorado Public Radio is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Colorado Public Radio
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
38%Colorado Public Radio (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,558
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510037.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate